The 12.8-fold rise in earthquakes that vanishes above magnitude 5
Showing the misleading chart
Fifty-six years of the USGS global catalogue, one threshold, one query, an axis that starts at zero — and a count that goes from 669 events a year to 8,558. Split the identical catalogue by magnitude and 94.6% of the growth sits in the half-magnitude band M4.5–4.9, the sliver at the edge of what the world could hear. The big ones hold near their long-run rate of about fifteen a year, with no trend that survives the choice of start date.
01The claim
Here is every earthquake of magnitude 4.5 or greater that the USGS recorded anywhere on Earth between 1970 and 2025 — one catalogue, one magnitude threshold, one query, 290,431 events. Not a sample, not a region, not a window: all fifty-six calendar years, the whole planet, every event above the line, on an axis that starts at zero. There is no truncation, no break, no log scale and no second axis. Nothing has been smoothed, de-clustered or modelled; this is a count. The threshold has not moved in fifty-six years, and it is not an arbitrary one either — M4.5 is the magnitude the National Earthquake Information Center states as its goal for global completeness. And the finding is not subtle. The record holds 669 qualifying events in 1970 and 8,558 in 2025, a factor of 12.8. Even measured from the settled mid-1970s the count has more than doubled: the last two decades run above 7,000 events a year against a 1970s norm below 3,000. Seismicity is not stationary. The earthquake book is rated off a stationary-hazard assumption, and on this record that assumption is out of date. Recommendation: a flat global loading on the FY27 earthquake book, and re-rate the retrocession programme at renewal.
02The trick
The threshold on that slide never moved. What moved was the number of instruments listening at it — and a threshold is only as fixed as the network underneath it, because nothing gets counted until something hears it. Split the identical catalogue into magnitude bands and the rise turns out to have an address. Between the first decade of the modern record and the last, the band M4.5–4.9 goes from 1,837 events a year to 5,688, a factor of 3.10. M5.0–5.9 goes from 1,440 to 1,623 — a factor of 1.13. M6.0–6.9 goes from 87.0 to 119.9, M7.0 and above from 10.2 to 13.4, both differences comfortably inside the year-to-year scatter of counts that small. Of the +4,070 events a year the catalogue gained, +3,851 of them — 94.6% — are in the single half-magnitude band at the edge of what the world could hear. Everything above M5.0 put together contributes 219. If the crust had genuinely got busier, that would show at every magnitude; a rise that lives entirely in the faintest cases is a fact about the microphones. The catalogue then convicts itself in its own arithmetic. Gutenberg and Richter established in 1944 that earthquake frequency falls off by a roughly constant factor per magnitude unit — about tenfold, the exponent written b, and close to 1 nearly everywhere on Earth. That fixes the ratio between two thresholds: for every M5.0+ there should be about 3.16 events at M4.5+. Run it backwards on the 1973–82 catalogue and the implied b between 4.5 and 5.0 comes out at 0.68, a value the crust does not produce, and which means roughly 1,500 quakes a year happened and were never written down. Run it forward through the decades and that number climbs steadily to 1.25 — while the same calculation between M6.0 and M7.0, where the network has been complete since the 1960s, sits at 0.98 in the 1970s and 1.00 today and never moves. One pair of magnitudes drifts and the other does not; that is the bottom band filling in, decade by decade, and it is visible in the catalogue without reference to anything outside it. The slide’s steepest stretch, meanwhile, is not even a network story but a change of catalogue: the NEIC bulletin that carries the modern global record begins on 1 January 1973, and before that ComCat holds only what earlier, sparser catalogues happened to catch. The whole planet yields 15 events in the M4.5–4.9 band for the year 1970. It yields 6,429 for 2025. That seam is where the ×12.8 comes from; measured from 1973 the same series gives ×2.84. The uncomfortable part is how much the slide gets right on the way past: a zero-based axis, all fifty-six years, the whole planet, every event above the line, one catalogue, one constant threshold, no smoothing, every figure printed. Eight things right, and the threshold sitting at the edge of hearing was enough on its own. (The slide is our own demonstration, drawn in the manner of a reinsurance board pack. The counts are real, taken from ComCat.)
03The fix
Hold the ruler still. Pick a magnitude the network could clear for the whole window rather than the one it can clear today, and re-plot: at M5.0 and above the fifty-six-year series is nearly flat, and at M7.0 and above it is a mean of 13.8 events a year with a standard deviation of 3.9 and a range of 6 to 24 — which sits neatly against the USGS’s own long-run expectation from the record since 1900, about fifteen in the magnitude-7 range plus one of magnitude 8 or greater. That throws away 95% of the data, and what it throws away is the part that was really about the sensors. It is also the number a catastrophe model is rated on, and it has not moved, so the recommendation the slide made was priced off an instrument upgrade. Then plot the effort next to the count wherever the effort was measured: stations reporting, tests performed, people screened, inspectors employed, hospitals participating. Two lines rising together answer the question in one glance, and where a coverage figure exists you can go further and divide by it, turning a count into a rate against effort — cases per thousand screened, detections per station-year — which is the quantity the reader believed they were being shown all along. Where nothing measures the effort directly, the data usually carries an internal check like this one: some stable proportion the phenomenon is known to obey, which a change in coverage will bend and a change in the world will not. Most of all, be exact in the caption about what the count is a count of. “Recorded”, “reported”, “diagnosed”, “detected” and “confirmed” are all different words from “happened”, and the gap between them is not a caveat but the finding. None of this is a criticism of the catalogue, which is superb and honest about itself: the USGS publishes the warning in its own earthquake FAQ — the record holds more earthquakes “not because there are more earthquakes, but because there are more seismic instruments” — right next to the data the slide was built from. The check that catches this one anywhere takes ten seconds. Ask what had to happen for a case to enter the dataset, then ask whether that has got easier over the span of the chart. Detection almost never gets harder.