MisleadingCharts
Back to the gallery

The needle read 989 twice, and the dial never said STORMY

Showing the misleading chart

Be the first to star this exhibit

A hall barometer reads 989 hPa on a full, untruncated 950–1050 dial and prints the word RAIN. Every figure on it is right. But a gauge shows a level and a storm is a rate: pressure at that station fell 57.2 hPa over the following 24 hours, and the same 989 arrives again fifteen hours later with the sky clearing — a tenth of a hectopascal and a quarter of a degree of arc between the way down and the way back up. The face changed its word twice on the way down and then not again for 26 hours, and at its lowest reading it was still 2.2 hPa short of the only word on it that would have described the afternoon.

01The claim

One reading, printed exactly as the station reports it: 989 hPa of sea-level pressure, from the automated weather station at the airport. Nothing is smoothed, averaged or rounded away. The dial is not truncated — it is drawn across its full 950 to 1050 hPa, every hectopascal of it, in even 10-point steps, with no break in the scale and no cap at the top. The ticks are evenly spaced, the whole range is on the face, and the number is printed underneath so nothing has to be estimated by eye. The words are the ones barometer faces have carried since long before the aneroid: STORMY, RAIN, CHANGE, FAIR, VERY DRY, with their edges at 28.5, 29.5, 30.0 and 30.5 inches of mercury. The needle sits a little over a third of the way round, in RAIN — 9.9 hPa clear of the CHANGE edge above it and 24.0 clear of the STORMY edge below, nowhere near a boundary, so no judgement is required of anybody. Read-out for the household: rain later. Bring the cushions in off the deck, and take a coat to the 11:15 ferry. The gutter can wait for the weekend. And if the weather turns, we shall see it out of the window.

02The trick

Everything on that face is true, and the read-out it produces is wrong, because a gauge shows a level and the thing the household wanted to know is a rate. The reading is 08:53 on the morning of 4 January 2018, and over the next seven hours the pressure at that station fell to 967.3 hPa. Measured end to end the fall is 57.2 hPa in 24 hours, from 1,024.7 at 19:53 on the 3rd to 967.5 at 19:53 on the 4th, with its fastest three-hour stretch worth 13.3 hPa on its own. A needle has one mark and no time axis, so none of that can appear on it; the dial simply sat where each successive number put it. The clearest way to see what that costs is a pair of readings from the station’s own record. At 13:53 UTC on the 4th the pressure was 989.1 hPa, falling 11.4 points in three hours, wind 29 kt gusting 50, visibility three statute miles in rain, +5 °C, with 21.8 hPa of the fall still ahead of it. At 04:53 UTC on the 5th it was 989.2 hPa, rising 7.4 points in three hours, wind 22 kt gusting 33, visibility ten miles, −3 °C, dry, with 21.9 hPa already recovered. The two raw messages even report the same altimeter setting, A2921. On a 100-hectopascal dial with a 270° sweep, one tenth of a hectopascal is 0.27 of a degree — narrower than the needle drawn over it — so the way down and the way back up are, to the instrument, the same picture. Two smaller mechanisms ride along, and both are what make a gauge different from a bent axis. The first is that the needle’s position is not a property of the number alone. There is no baseline and no zero here: the needle lands at the value minus the minimum, over the maximum minus the minimum, so the minimum shifts every reading and the width divides it — two settings, neither of them the measurement, and both typed in once on installation. The same 989.1 hPa is 39.1% of the way round a 950–1050 dial, 15.2% of a 980–1040 one — the narrower span weather widgets often ship with — and 54.1% of a dial running 870 to 1,090, which is wide enough for every sea-level pressure on record. That is 105.2° of arc between the extremes, from one measurement, and on the 980–1040 dial the afternoon’s minimum would have been drawn pinned to the bottom peg with nothing to say how far past it the storm went. Worth naming plainly: a face that starts at 950 is a truncated axis, by exactly the arithmetic that gives a bar chart its zero. The curve is what hides it, and the standfirst’s proud “not truncated” is about the top of the scale rather than the bottom. Nor can it simply be put back, because a barometer drawn from zero would be useless — which is the honest version of the problem. A gauge has no baseline to restore, so its range is a judgement, and a judgement has to be declared. The second is the words. Five of them, four edges, drawn once and identical in every hallway the instrument is ever hung in, and they convert a continuous quantity into a verdict — the exact inverse of choosing class breaks after the data arrives, and no safer for it. Across the whole five days the face showed three of its five words. It turned from FAIR to CHANGE at 05:53 on the 4th and from CHANGE to RAIN at 11:53, with 29.5 hPa of the fall still ahead, and then it stopped: RAIN stood for the next 26 hours and 27 observations, across the rest of the drop, the minimum and the whole recovery. At the lowest reading of the event, 967.3 hPa, with the station gusting to 53 kt, the needle was still 2.2 hPa short of STORMY, the only word on the face that would have described the afternoon. And the rate was never missing from the data. Every three hours the station coded the pressure tendency into the same message the dial read its number out of: 58133 at 17:53 on the 4th means the pressure fell 13.3 hPa in three hours, and that message also carried the plain-language remark PRESFR, pressure falling rapidly. The gauge took the level out of the wire and dropped the rest of it. (Both drawings are ours; the cottage, the household and the read-out on the first are invented, and every measurement on both is real.)

03The fix

Give the number back its history. A single value almost never means anything on its own, and the smallest honest fix costs no more space than the dial did: a short line of the last day or two with the current reading printed beside it, so the level, the direction and the rate arrive together. Where the rate is the finding, plot the rate — a bar per hour of the change over the previous three hours turns this station’s 4 January into a picture nobody could misread, and it is a number the system already had, because the sensor that reported the level reported the tendency in the same breath. That is worth checking before building anything: the quantity you need is very often already in the feed, dropped by the widget rather than missing from the data. When you do draw both, put them on one time axis, ticks aligned, so the reader can carry a moment from the level down to the rate without doing arithmetic in their head. Then treat the gauge’s two limits as what they are, an axis. Print the range in the caption the way you print a unit, hold it fixed across every gauge on a page, run the minimum to zero wherever the quantity has one — and where it does not, say so, because an undeclared range is a truncation that happens to be curved. Never let a value past the maximum be drawn pinned to it: a needle against the peg is a clipped axis in a second body, and it should own up with an arrow and a printed figure. Keep the coloured zones only for decisions that genuinely are categorical, say at each edge what the threshold is and who set it, and print the number as well as the word, since a reading one unit inside a boundary and a reading at the far end of it are the same colour and not the same news. None of this makes a gauge useless. It is a genuinely good instrument for the job it was built for — glanced at, live, read for which side of a line you are on, which is why cockpits and boilers still have them — and a barometer face is honest about that job the moment you notice what a real aneroid has that a dashboard tile does not: a second, manually set pointer, parked against the needle the last time you looked, so the instrument can show you the one thing a single mark cannot. The distinction to hold on to is between a position and a change: a gauge answers where the number is, and only a series answers where it is going. And for comparing several quantities, drop the form entirely — a row of gauges is a row of separate scales, each with its own hand-typed limits, which is the free-scale small multiple in circular dress. One sorted, zero-based bar chart puts them all on the same ruler, in less room than the dials it replaces.