The 73% fall that is 15% once the cohorts are the same age
Showing the misleading chart
A fleet safety briefing we drew counts vehicle recall campaigns by the model year they name, straight out of NHTSA’s own recalls flat file: model years 2012 to 2026, every vehicle campaign in the file, a linear axis that is zero-based, evenly ticked and unbroken, and every value printed above its own column. The series peaks at 2,163 campaigns on model year 2019 and stands at 582 on model year 2026 — a fall of 73.1%, which the desk reads as a defect rate in retreat. Every number is right. But a recall arrives years after the vehicle does, so each column counts events gathered over a different length of time: model year 2019 has been collecting them for 2,808 days and model year 2026 for 251. Watch both cohorts for the same 251 days and the fall from 2,163 to 582 becomes a fall from 687 to 582 — 15.3%. On a fixed two-year window, across the thirteen model years whose window has closed, the same file runs the other way: 727 campaigns on model year 2012 rising to 1,221 on model year 2024.
01The claim
Vehicles are being recalled far less than they were. The figures are a straight count out of NHTSA’s own recalls flat file — the Part 573 defect and noncompliance reports manufacturers are obliged to file, one source, one field, one definition — and every vehicle campaign in the file is on the chart. The axis is linear, zero-based, evenly ticked and unbroken; nothing is sampled, smoothed, indexed or rescaled; every value is printed above its own column. Recall campaigns naming each model year peak at 2,163 on model year 2019 and fall away from there, seven consecutive model years below the peak, ending 1,715, 1,421, 1,090 and finally 582 on model year 2026. That is a fall of 73.1%, and the three newest model years are the three smallest columns on the chart. Read-out for the desk: treat the defect rate on new vehicles as falling. Hold the campaign-management headcount flat into next year rather than growing it with the fleet, and move the recall-readiness budget to the model years that still carry the volume — the 2015 to 2022 cohorts.
02The trick
Every count on that slide is right, the axis really is zero-based, no campaign in the file is missing — and the chart still cannot support the sentence in its headline, because the fifteen columns are not fifteen comparable measurements. A recall does not arrive with the vehicle. A manufacturer files a Part 573 report when it decides a defect is safety-related, and that decision can come seven years after the car was built: on this file a model year keeps gaining campaigns for well over a decade. So each column counts everything that has arrived so far, and “so far” is a different length of time in every column. Model year 2019 has been collecting recalls since 1 January 2019 — 2,808 days, counted to the last report in the file. Model year 2026 has been collecting them for 251. The x-axis is doing two jobs at once: it is a category axis, and it is a clock running backwards. Give both cohorts the same clock and the finding evaporates. At 251 days old, model year 2019 had 687 campaigns and model year 2026 has 582 — a gap of 15.3%, not 73.1%. Model year 2025, which the slide draws half a peak below 2019, had 603 at the same age. Run the age match across all fifteen and the series is a rise through the early years and then a plateau: 368, 388, 461, 606, 667, 623, 608, 687, 583, 668, 680, 647, 628, 603, 582. The cliff is gone, because the cliff was never in the data — it was the right-hand edge of the file. The same thing said the other way round: model year 2019’s column on the first chart is 2,163, and at the age model year 2026 has now reached it stood at 687. That is 31.8% of what it would eventually become. Nothing about the 2026 column tells you it is 31.8% of the way through its own history, and nothing about a bar ever can. Two checks confirm the diagnosis. The first is the oldest cohort: model year 2012, fourteen years on, picked up another 12 campaigns in the twelve months to 9 September 2026, so not a single column on the chart is final. The second is the flow. Count the same campaigns by the year they were filed rather than by the model year they name and nothing has gone quiet at all: 583 vehicle campaigns filed in 2012, 880 in 2019, a peak of 988 in 2021, 950 in 2024 and 891 in 2025. That series is flat to rising over the years the first chart draws as a collapse; the campaigns are simply landing on model years that have been on the road for a while, which is where they always landed. And the failure runs in the direction that flatters, every time. Late-arriving events are usually bad events — defects, claims, defaults, complaints, revisions — so an immature cohort always looks like an improvement, and the newest cohort, the one the meeting is about, looks like the best of all. (NHTSA publishes the file; both drawings are ours, and the desk, the read-out and the recommendation on the first are invented.)
03The fix
Give every cohort the same clock, and say what the clock is. The redraw keeps all fifteen model years and every campaign behind them, and adds three things the briefing had no room for. First, the development curves: cumulative campaigns against the cohort’s own age, one line per model year, each stopping where the file does. That picture is the whole mechanism in one frame — every curve climbs steeply for two years and the oldest is still climbing at fourteen, and the dashed rule at 251 days crosses all fifteen of them while they are still in that first steep climb. It also shows what the first chart was really doing, which was reading fifteen different lines at fifteen different points and drawing the heights side by side. Second, the same fifteen model years age-matched at 251 days, which is all the age the youngest has: 687 for model year 2019 against 582 for model year 2026, and a plateau rather than a cliff across the whole span. Third, a fixed two-year window — campaigns filed by 31 December of the year after the model year — which is the convention a desk would actually use, and which runs the other way: across the thirteen model years whose window has closed, 727 campaigns on model year 2012 rising to 1,340 on model year 2022 and 1,221 on model year 2024, up 68.0% over exactly the years the first chart drew as a collapse. Model years 2025 and 2026 are still inside their windows, which do not close until the end of this year and the end of next, so they are drawn as hollow dashed outlines at 1,090 and 582 so far — the treatment this page recommends for a cohort that has to appear before it is finished, and the reason the solid part of the series stops at 2024. In general: pick a window every cohort has completed, print it in the caption the way you print a unit, and let the solid part of the chart end where the window ends — a series that stops a year or two short of the file is more useful than one that runs to the edge and is wrong at the end. Draw the development curves beside the bars, since they cost one panel and settle the question. Where an immature cohort must be shown, give it its own style and label it incomplete, or project it from the mature curves and call the projection a projection; actuaries have done exactly this for a century, under the name development factors. Print the as-of date, because every number on a chart like this is “as at” something. And never take a percentage change between two cohorts of different age: that arithmetic is being done by the calendar, not by the world.