The Italian band that fell with the market in the year Italy rose 25%

Dark navy review slide, kicker “Buying desk · Bowed strings · Annual import review · United States”, headlined “Bowed-string imports fell 25% in 2025 — and the Italian band fell with them”. A subhead says the chart shows every violin, viola, cello and double bass imported into the United States by country of origin from 2005 to 2025, as import values straight from UN Comtrade, every origin included, stacked on one zero-based axis with nothing cropped. A badge reads “Demonstration · drawn by us from public data”. The main panel, titled “U.S. imports of bowed string instruments (HS 9202.10) · value by country of origin, $ millions”, is a stacked area chart on an axis from $0M to $50M: a large blue China band at the bottom, thinner grey bands for Romania, Germany and other origins above it, and a thin gold band labelled “Italy · workshop-made, the gold band” riding on top. The whole stack climbs from about $34M in 2005 to peaks of about $44M in 2016 and 2023, with deep dips in 2009, 2020 and 2025. Two gold markers sit on the top edge of the gold band: “2020: down with the market” at the 2020 dip and “2025: down again” at the 2025 end. To the right, a big gold “−25%” is captioned as bowed-string imports falling from $39.6M in 2024 to $29.6M in 2025, the smallest year since 2020. A read-out says the Italian band, the fine-instrument end of the market, tracks the total — down in 2020, back up through 2023, down again in 2025 — so workshop instruments are not insulated from the cycle. A recommendation says to trim the 2026 Italian consignment order in line with the market, by about a quarter. A table lists the last six years of all-origin and Chinese import values with the yearly change in the total, from $23.7M and $19.3M in 2020 (−39%) to $29.6M and $23.2M in 2025 (−25%). The footer says every origin is counted, the axis is zero-based and the values are published and unsmoothed; that the figures are the CIF value of U.S. imports of HS 9202.10 as reported by the United States to UN Comtrade, in current dollars; and that the slide is a demonstration in which the desk, the read-out and the recommendation are invented and every import value is real. — Showing the misleading chart

Cream-background chart headlined “Italian imports rose 25% in 2025. Their band just rode the stack down.” A subhead says that in a stack only the bottom band has a baseline; Italy sat on top, so its edges were China’s edges plus everyone else’s, and the 2025 fall it seemed to share was China’s; unstacked, the slide’s two years come apart: all origins fell 39% in 2020 and 25% in 2025, while Italy slipped 5% and then rose 25%, to $1.92 million, the most in current dollars in the 21-year series. Down the left run three small line charts from 2005 to 2025, each on its own zero-based axis, with 2020 and 2025 shaded. “All origins, $0–50M” falls to $23.7M (−39%) in 2020 and $29.6M (−25%) in 2025. “China, $0–50M” has the same shape, falling to $19.3M (−41%) in 2020 and $23.2M (−29%) in 2025. “Italy, $0–2.5M — its own zero, its own ruler”, in gold, moves between about $0.6M and $1.6M until 2021, with peaks of $1.33M in 2007 and $1.59M in 2016, barely moves in 2020 ($0.96M, −5%), climbs to $1.77M in 2023, dips to $1.53M in 2024 and reaches $1.92M (+25%) in 2025. On the right, two small stacked area charts on the same $0–50M axis show the same numbers twice: “As the slide drew it: Italy on top”, where the gold band rides the jagged top edge, and “Same numbers, Italy at the bottom”, where the gold band is a thin strip along the floor that rises gently at the right while the bands above it dip. A card headed “How to read a band that floats” says the gold band is the same in both stacks; on top its position is set by the $23–43 million of imports from every other origin underneath it and the eye follows the position, while at the bottom it has a floor; a band can only be read by its thickness, and a $1.5-to-$1.9 million change is a few pixels on a $50 million axis. A card headed “What the desk’s years look like unstacked” lists 2019 to 2020: all origins $38.9M to $23.7M (−39%), Italy $1.02M to $0.96M (−5%); and 2024 to 2025: all origins $39.6M to $29.6M (−25%), China $32.8M to $23.2M (−29%), Italy $1.53M to $1.92M (+25%) on 224 to 255 instruments. A card headed “One caveat on ‘the most’” says these are current dollars, and that in 2025 dollars 2016’s $1.59M is about $2.13M and 2007’s $1.33M about $2.06M, so 2025 is the third-highest year in real terms, still a rise and not a fall. The footer credits UN Comtrade and the BLS CPI-U annual averages used for the inflation adjustment, and says the buying desk is invented and both drawings are ours. — Showing the misleading chart

Be the first to star this exhibit

A buying-review slide we drew from UN Comtrade data stacks U.S. imports of violins, violas, cellos and double basses by country of origin, with Italy as the thin gold band on top. When the total fell 25% in 2025, the gold band dropped with it, and the slide reads that as Italian instruments following the market down. Unstacked, Italian imports rose 25%, from $1.53 million to $1.92 million, the most in current dollars in the 21-year series.

United Nations, UN Comtrade database — imports reported by the United States, HS 9202.10 (string musical instruments played with a bow, mainly violins, violas, cellos and double basses), annual, by partner (country of origin), 2005 to 2025, CIF value in current U.S. dollars, retrieved 7 October 2026; inflation adjustment by us with U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI-U annual averages (CUUR0000SA0), 2026Added October 7, 2026

01The claim

The fine-instrument end of the market fell with everything else. An annual import review of the kind a string shop’s buying desk might circulate, which we drew from UN Comtrade data: U.S. imports of violins, violas, cellos and double basses, stacked by country of origin on a zero-based axis, every origin included. The total fell 25% in 2025, from $39.6 million to $29.6 million, and the thin gold band for Italian instruments on top of the stack dropped right along with it, just as it had in 2020. Recommendation: trim the Italian order by about a quarter.

02The trick

Every number on the slide is right, and nothing is cropped. The problem is which band the slide is reading. In a stacked area chart only the bottom band starts at zero. Every band above it starts wherever the band below it happened to end, so its height on the page comes from everything underneath it. Italy sits on top, so the bottom edge of the gold band is China plus Romania plus Germany plus everyone else, and the top edge is the U.S. total. In recent years China has been about four-fifths of that total, so the gold band goes wherever China goes. The eye follows a thin band by its position, and its position is the total. Italy itself is only the gap between the two edges, $1.5 to $1.9 million on a $50 million axis, a few pixels whichever way it moves. In 2025 Chinese imports fell 29%, from $32.8 million to $23.2 million, and took the whole stack down with them. Over the same year Italian imports rose 25%, from $1.53 million to $1.92 million (224 instruments to 255), the most in current dollars in the 21 years of the series. In 2020 the total fell 39% while Italy slipped 5%. The slide’s two markers sit on the market’s two worst years: in one Italy barely moved, and in the other it went the opposite way.

03The fix

Give the series you want read its own zero. Three small line charts on a shared time axis, each with its own zero-based ruler, settle it at a glance: all origins and China drop in 2020 and 2025, and Italy barely dips in 2020 and climbs to a series high in 2025. If the stack has to stay, because the question really is how the whole is divided, put the band you are asking about at the bottom, where it has a floor. The same numbers with Italy at the bottom draw a thin gold strip that rises at the right while everything above it falls. Then print the band’s own values next to it, since a $0.4 million change is too thin to see on a $50 million axis. One caveat belongs on the honest version too. The record is in current dollars. In 2025 dollars (CPI-U), 2016’s $1.59 million is about $2.13 million and 2007’s $1.33 million about $2.06 million, so 2025 is the third-highest year in real terms. That still makes it a rise, not a fall to cut an order over.